When we looked at the characteristic function for the subset of a set, we started by examining both sums and products of the characteristic function in Last week, we looked at the multiset sum, which we defined in terms of the cardinal sum that we’ve been using for a while now. To consider the multiset analogue of the products of characteristic functions, we need another bit of cardinal arithmetic.

Definition

Let be a set, be a family of cardinals, and be a family of sets such that for . The product of this family of cardinals is

For infinite index sets the axiom of choice ensures that the set product is not empty. As with the sum, it is possible to prove that does not depend on the choice of sets and so the product is well-defined.

Definition

Let be an indexed family of multisets. The multiset product of is the multiset

As we saw with the multiset sum, for all The cardinal product on the right is therefore well-defined, and the result is again a multiset over Unsurprisingly, we also use the infix notation when dealing with just a pair of multisets. This binary operation on is both commutative and associative.

The cardinal product satisfies the equation for all It follows that if and only if for all This gives us the following identity:

As a binary operation on the multiset product is not in general idempotent. Unlike the multiset sum, however, the class of multisets where is closed under multiset products. For this class, it is even idempotent. Even more suggestive is the fact that if and only if and

These observations raise a question: is the multiset product a good candidate to be viewed as an extension to multisets of the intersection of sets? Let’s consider the set and the multisets and (the expression indicates that is the multiplicity of in the given multiset). Here, we have

This is contrary to the intuitive idea that an intersection should always be contained in every multiset that participates in the intersection. Counterintuitive results aren’t always wrong. Given the notation, however, we can easily guess that we will soon see an operation that is a better choice to consider as an intersection of multisets.

This entry was posted on Monday, May 19th, 2008 at 4:00 am and is filed under Mathematics, Multisets. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

[…] Last Monday, I mentioned that multiset products are not the best available extension of the intersection of a family of sets so that it applies to […]

[…] Last Monday, I mentioned that multiset products are not the best available extension of the intersection of a family of sets so that it applies to […]